HOME

Chronology

Images


   Black Court
   Chinnayya
   Daniel Pullei
   Engelhardt
   Gold Foil
   Gulam Muhammad
   Kapilaivaasagam
   Letters to Daniel
   Leyel
   Mission
   Modi documents
   Peder Hansen
   Sami Setty
   Treaties
   Vaiyapuri's marriage
   Viraraghava Ayyangar

Pictures

   Tranquebar
   Tanjore
   Chennai

LINKS
 

Black Court

The Danish Justice system before 1781 consisted of a series of lower courts, a High Court and finally a Supreme Court.  As a consideration to the local ethnic people, another lower court, the Black Court was formed. This consisted usually of a Proveditor (a local police commissioner), a dubash, a secretary and six assessors consisting of two Malabars (Hindus), two Moors (Muslims) and two Christians. A European observer was stationed at the Court in order to ensure a correct proceeding without having the power to judge. A proclamation from 1781 claimed that judgments should be passed taking into account the customs and traditions of the Indians. Cases pertaining to castes such as ceremonial rights and inheritance were left to the castes themselves. The members of the Black Court were apparently not satisfied with the social ranks in the society; they wanted a recognisable symbol of their dignified status. In an additional proclamation from 1789, they were granted status symbols such as a stick with silver head and an umbrella on a tall stake. In addition, the judgment was to be written in Tamil, and read aloud in the court before getting translated into Danish.

Some of the images below show proceedings of the Black Court. In image 2185b41 which is the first page of the proceedings, the contents are described. In the second page, the presence of three Tamil assessors is described; the assessors are Viraraghava Ayyangar, Yosef and Gulam Muhammad and Arunachalam (image 2185b42). The date for this proceeding is given in Tamil as 1805 Ani 5, Wednesday.  According to "An Indian Ephemeris A. D. 1800 to A. D. 2000" by L. D. Swamikannu Pillai (Asian Educational Services), Ani 5 should be a Sunday.   Again in the following case - Ani 7  Friday should be a Tuesday according to Swamikannu Pillai. In several of the other documents, there is a discrepancy in the weekdays between the archive and Swamikannu Pillai.
.

CLICK ON THE THUMBNAILS FOR LARGER PICTURES

black court black courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack courtblack court